Warren was one of the young legal academics who attended these seminars, and was largely convinced by the arguments. Chen, and Suresh Naidu has shown, these seminars played a crucial role in shifting American courts to the right. As statistical research by Elliott Ash, Daniel L.
Attendees were taught that harsh sentences would deter future crime, that government regulation should be treated with profound skepticism, and that antitrust enforcement had worse consequences than the monopolies it was supposed to correct.
For decades, conservative foundations supported seminars that taught judges and legal academics the principles of public choice economics. Perhaps the most influential version of public choice was known as law and economics. Regulations were not made in the public interest, but instead were designed to bilk ordinary citizens. Public choice economists argued that government regulations were the product of special interest groups that had “captured” the power of the state, to cripple rivals and squeeze money from citizens and consumers. For political and theoretical reasons, they instead saw government as a fountain of corruption. Public choice scholars vehemently disagreed. Samuelson, in his famous and influential textbooks, saw a clear role for government in regulating markets. Public choice came into being in fervent opposition to the mainstream of economics, which was dominated by scholars such as Paul Samuelson. It is a school of economic thought that has at different times been associated with scholars at the University of Rochester, Virginia Tech, and George Mason University. Public choice economics has big influence and a bad name. Like Olson, Warren is not a socialist but a left-wing capitalist, who wants to use public choice ideas to cleanse both markets and the state of their corruption. Yet there is a left version of public choice economics too, associated with thinkers such as the late Mancur Olson. This economic theory is reviled by many on the left, who have claimed that it is a Koch-funded intellectual conspiracy designed to destroy democracy. Warren is reviving a pro-market left that has been neglected for decades, by drawing on a surprising resource: public choice economics.
I understand that i will never understand free#
President Donald Trump are no fans of open trade and free markets, and even favor social protections so long as they benefit their white supporters. It has been clear since 2016 that the traditional coalition of the right was breaking up. For a long time, political debate in the United States has been a fight between conservatives and libertarians on the right, who favored the market, and socialists and liberals on the left, who favored the government. Warren’s politics are so confusing because we have forgotten that a pro-capitalist left is even possible. Her enemies on the right claim that she is a socialist, but Warren describes herself as “capitalist to my bones.” She wants free markets, but also wants to tax billionaires’ capital. Elizabeth Warren’s politics seem like a tangle of contradictions.
0 kommentar(er)
